Philips Sonicare DiamondClean Sonic electric toothbrush HX9351/04 5 modes 1 brush head Glass charger USB travel charger is rated 4.1 out of 5 by 440.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Fantastic I decided to buy this after going back to a traditional toothbrush a few years ago. The Phillips Sonicare is excellent and since using it no more toothache and great feeling teeth. The settings are good too, from cleaning to polishing to whitening and a sensitive mode. It keeps its charge for weeks and is well made. I opted for the black one as I think it's class and no build up marks to show later. A great toothbrush, a cut above the rest and well worth the money when it's on offer in Boots.
Date published: 2016-01-30
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good toothbrush but drawbacks Nice toothbrush, similar in performance to our last Philips but 2 big drawbacks. Our last brush had a power scale so you could see how much charge was left and also indicated when the brush was fully charged, this one doesn't and your left with no idea when it might run out and also when it's fully charged and and you can remove it from the charging glass, also there aren't differently coloured rings on the brush heads to identify whose brush is whose, they're all just blue, big pity that!
Date published: 2016-02-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Great toothbrush but does not last Cleans very well but does not last. It is a disposable for the wealthy.
Date published: 2018-05-15
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great results Never used an electric toothbrush before but as I have over brushed my teeth in the past I thought I would give this a go as it has the sensitive mode. Great results every day feels like I have been to the hygienist. Only downside is the silly idea of recharging via the glass! If you can get the toothbrush in the correct position and standing up without falling over! Bin that idea entirely and use the usb/case its much more efficent
Date published: 2016-03-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Amazing Clean teeth! My second Philips Sonicare. The first developed a fault after 3 years, but was so much better than the previous Oral B Triumph I used. This new brush is even better, with the Diamond brush heads firmer to give an even deeper clean. Trips to the dentist as much shorter since using Sonicare, i no longer have to endure the Hygenist, and my Dentist gives me a clean bill of health.
Date published: 2016-02-21
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Good toothbrush, but poor reliability Ive had this toothbrush for 1 year, it cleans really well and is nice looking. BUT it is extremely unreliable, currently im on my 3rd one!! luckily replaced under warranty.
Date published: 2017-11-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Successful transition to electric Bit dubious at the start to 'go electric again'. A very good dentist suggested I 'give it a try'. OK bit noisy to start with but hey does it wake you up! Great product with good range of 'programs' and your teeth feel like they are clean. Given that in my world nothing is perfect this comes very, very close. Once you get used to the way of handling the device it feels OK.
Date published: 2016-01-25
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Teeth feel cleaner I started using the product shortly after Christmas when I received it as a present. I went to the dentist on 15th January. My limescale isn't bad anyway and there wasn't any change in my normal 6 monthly checkup. It's too soon to tell if the brush will make a long-term difference but the fact that the action feels more robust, makes me enjoy the experience.
Date published: 2016-01-27
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Excellent product I absolutely love this toothbrush. I have used other battery operated brushes but this far exceeds them. After using this for 6 months, my check up at the dentist did not require any cleaning - for the first time ever! The dentist was very impressed. I highly recommend it. It seems expensive but why not invest in your health! Who wants dentures when they get older - not me!!!
Date published: 2013-01-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Expensive but good product, but failed after 2 years. Worked well while it lasted , I am on my 2nd replacement the first motor detached it self from the base. This one has failed after 2 years and will no longer charge, due to some charging circuitry fault. It is unacceptable for a toothbrush of this cost to fail on average of once a year. It is now out of warranty, so I guess its an expensive paperweight.
Date published: 2014-02-10
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Protective covers for brush heads This is a good toothbrush, better looking than the previous models (I have been using Phillips toothbrushes for ever). However, I can not get over the fact, that the case does not accumulate protective cover(c) for the brush heads. My previous model dose have enough space in the case for those covers, so I continue to take this one for traveling.
Date published: 2012-12-11
Rated 5 out of 5 by from My second one,just as good This is my second Sonicare toothbrush , my first one failed after 2.5 years use but I was very impressed with the performance so I bought the latest version. I find the glass charger unit a bit of a pain to use but the other charger for use when you are away from home is excellent .It cleans your teeth really well and is easy to use.
Date published: 2015-01-03
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Good toothbrush Really cleans the teeth well. Only downsides are 1.If you want to change the mode, you can only do this when the brush is going, and it is a bit messy.(Water splashing everywhere)2 The vibration of the brush does cause splashing on surrounding surfaces. But overall, it is very good, and does the job that it is supposed to.
Date published: 2015-08-06
Rated 1 out of 5 by from failed after 10 months the most expensive model I have purchased not up to much failed after 10 months
Date published: 2017-08-04
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Can really tell the difference Been using this since Christmas dentist has confirmed she can tell the difference with my teeth already. Not sure I would have paid this much as its very expensive but it was a present. I haven't used an electric toothbrush before so I can't comment if it's any better or worse than a cheaper model.
Date published: 2016-02-19