Optimal support for children during MRI with Ambient Experience

  • Featuring
    |
    |
    |
    |
  • August 12 2025
  • 6 min read

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic imaging modality of choice for pediatric patients. However, it can be challenging to scan young children awake while maintaining a high image quality with an efficient, patient-friendly workflow.  In a clinical trial, including six European hospitals, we investigated if Ambient Experience, an audio-visual intervention with specially designed pediatric content (see Fig. 1), could reduce MRI related patient anxiety and workflow-issues in children during an awake MRI.

At-a-glance:

  • Ambient Experience with specially designed pediatric content was evaluated in six European hospitals
  • The study included 175 children between 6-12 years and assessed the impact of Ambient Experience on patient anxiety and workflow
  • Stress level of young children (aged 6-10 years) decreased more strongly from before to after the MRI when scanned with Ambient Experience
  • Patients who had their MRI with Ambient Experience had significantly fewer scan issues
Ambient Experience for pediatric MRI with Disney content on wall

Background

Young children are often scanned using sedation or anesthesia to secure efficient workflows and high-quality images. Awake scanning presents advantages such as shorter waiting lists [1], reduced hospital time [2], lower cost [2,3], decreased risk of unexpected incidents [4-6] and reduced exposure to potentially neurotoxic anesthetic agents [7-9]. Effective stress management is crucial during awake scans to mitigate heightened anxiety, that can contribute to pediatric medical traumatic stress [10,11] and impact workflow.

This study investigated Ambient Experience’s effectiveness in reducing stress in pediatric patients aged 6-12 years. Children were either scanned with Ambient Experience (intervention group), or without (control group). We evaluated children’s situational anxiety levels (general feelings of stress, worry, nervousness, or unease) and the incidence of scan-related issues (e.g., repeat sequences, lengthy pauses between sequences, failure to obtain diagnostic images).

Method and materials

Patients were recruited from hospitals located in Poland, Spain, Denmark, Germany, Belgium, and France, and included children scheduled for a first head-first, awake MRI. After enrollment, patients were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group.

The Philips MRI systems equipped with Ambient Experience (Fig. 1), is designed to create a calming atmosphere and provide guidance and positive distraction during the scan.

Fig. 1 MRI room equipped to provide child-friendly audio-visual intervention, including a) an in-bore screen, b) headphones, c) mirror, d) colored lighting, and e) wall projection

Fig. 1 MRI room equipped to provide child-friendly audio-visual intervention, including a) an in-bore screen, b) headphones, c) mirror, d) colored lighting, and e) wall projection.

Five calming five-minute clips were created, featuring well-known animated characters, to provide comfort to children through familiarity (Fig. 2). The content created has gentle, slow-paced visuals, because fast-paced content can reduce young children’s ability to follow instructions or regulate their behavior [12-15]. Since head motion and eye movements during an MRI may cause motion artefacts, character movement was focused on center-screen. Pre-made sets of clips were created, varying from 15-25 minutes, and displayed on the interface, showing the first clip’s character image. Control was provided to improve patient calmness [11,16] by allowing children to choose the first clip to watch.

Fig. 2. Child-friendly content displayed on the in-bore screen of the audio-visual system.

Fig. 2. Child-friendly content displayed on the in-bore screen of the audio-visual system.

Data were collected using questionnaires for patients and staff, and by extracting data from MRI system logfiles (i.e., exam length, number of repeat scan sequences, number of pauses between sequences).

When entering the MRI room, patients in the intervention group selected pediatric content, which was displayed on the in-bore screen, visible in a head-mounted mirror (Fig. 3), and accompanied with sound and light.

Fig. 3 Procedure (intervention group); a) patient selects pediatric content on the interface, b) content is displayed in the scan room using ceiling lighting, in-bore display and optionally wall projection, c) during the scan, distraction and guidance is visible for the patient in a head-mounted mirror, d) after the scan the child receives a soft toy

Fig. 3. Procedure; patient selects pediatric content on the interface (a), content is displayed in the scan room using ceiling lighting, in-bore display and optionally wall projection (b), and visible during the scan in a head-mounted mirror (c), after the scan the child receives a soft toy (d).

Results

175 children (89 girls, 84 boys, two unrecorded) participated in the study. Most children (78%) had a head/brain MRI, and one in three children (34%) required an intravenous injection for contrast. 60% of the patients had never had an MRI before.

The study showed that Ambient Experience significantly reduced scan issues for younger children (aged 6-10 years). This effect holds regardless of whether scan issues are reported by staff or measured directly in the MRI log files. Next to reducing scan issues, Ambient Experience significantly reduced stress levels in younger children (aged 6-10 years), as rated by staff. Younger children’s stress levels decreased to levels comparable to those of older children (age 10+ years), who experienced low stress levels regardless of condition.

The intervention did not significantly affect stress levels or the incidence of scan issues for older children included in this study (10+ years), who showed low stress levels and for whom scan issues were rare. While it seems likely that younger children stand to benefit most from audio-visual interventions, in the current study, the content of the clips may have been more engaging for younger children. Future research should employ clips that are more engaging for older children (10+ years).

Overall, the current research indicates that providing children with a calming environment and child-friendly in-bore content can reduce stress levels (as reported by staff) in young children (aged 6-10 years). Moreover, it can support clinicians by reducing scan issues and disruptions, thereby improving the workflow and facilitating clinicians to achieve high-quality diagnostic images.

While the study was not focused on anesthesia reduction, the intervention lowered younger children’s level of stress and scan issues to the level of older children, potentially lowering the threshold for awake scanning. Further research is needed to explore the role of child-friendly content in reducing the need for anesthesia in pediatric MRI.

Conclusion

A child friendly Audio-Visual intervention during MR imaging procedures delivers benefits for patient experience and workflow efficiency. The current study showed a reduction in stress levels, as well as fewer operational disruptions during an MRI exam for pediatric patients (aged 6-10 years).

Clinical study MR related anxiety & workflow: impact of a child‑friendly audio‑visual intervention

Copy this URLto share this story with your professional network
Sign up for news and updates
Lady using a tablet
Footnotes
  1. Runge S, Christensen N, Jensen K et al (2018) Children centered care: Minimizing the need for anesthesia with a multifaceted concept for MRI in children aged 4–6. European Journal of Radiology 107:183-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.026
  2. Rudder B, Easley S, Robinson A et al (2019) Effects of an MRI Try Without program on patient access. Pediatric Radiology 49(13):1712-1717 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04487-1
  3. Vanderby S, Babyn P, Carter M et al (2010) Effect of Anesthesia and Sedation on Pediatric MR Imaging Patient Flow. Radiology 256(1):229-237 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091124
  4. Chen J, Zapala M, Zhou A et al (2023) Factors and Labor Cost Savings Associated with Successful Pediatric Imaging without Anesthesia: a Single Institution Study. Academic Radiology 30(9):1979-1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.12.041
  5. Jaimes C, Murcia D, Miguel K et al (2018) Identification of quality improvement areas in pediatric MRI from analysis of patient safety reports. Pediatric Radiology 48(1):66-73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3989-4
  6. [Snyder E, Zhang W, Chua Jasmin K et al (2018) Gauging potential risk for patients in pediatric radiology by review of over 2,000 incident reports. Pediatric Radiology 48(13):1867-1874 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4238-1
  7. Mallory M, Travers C, Cravero J et al (2023) Pediatric Sedation/Anesthesia for MRI: Results From the pediatric sedation research consortium. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 57:1106-1113 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28392
  8. Artunduaga M, Amber Liu C, Morin C et al (2021) Safety challenges related to the use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examinations. Pediatric Radiology 51:724-735 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05044-5
  9. Useinovic N and Jevtovic-Todorovic V (2023) Controversies in Anesthesia-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 37(1):28-39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2023.03.004
  10. Ing C, Warner D, Sun L et al (2022) Anesthesia and Developing Brains: Unanswered Questions and Proposed Paths Forward. Anesthesiology 136(3):500-512 https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004116
  11. Lerwick J (2016) Minimizing pediatric healthcare-induced anxiety and trauma. World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics 5(2):143-150 https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v5.i2.143
  12. Cooper N, Uller C, Pettifer J et al (2009) Conditioning attentional skills: examining the effects of the pace of television editing on children’s attention. Acta Pædiatrica 98:1651-1655 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01377.x
  13. Lillard A, Drell M, Richey E, et al (2015) Further Examination of the Immediate Impact of Television on Childrens Executive Function. Developmental Psychology 51(6):792-805 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039097
  14. Geist E and Gibson M (2000) The Effect of Network and Public Television Programs on Four- and Five-Year Olds Ability to Attend to Educational Tasks. Journal of Instructional Psychology 27(4):250-261
  15. Essex C, Gliga T, Singh M and Smith T (2022) Understanding the differential impact of children’s TV on executive functions: a narrative-processing analysis. Infant Behavior and Development 66:101661 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2021.101661
  16. Hogendoorn S, Wolters L, Vervoort L et al (2008) An indirect and direct measure of anxiety-related perceived control in children: The Implicit Association Procedure (IAP) and Anxiety Control Questionnaire for Children (ACQ-C). Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 39:436-450 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2007.11.003
Disclaimer
Results are specific to the institution where they were obtained and may not reflect the results achievable at other institutions. Results in other cases may vary.