There are many definitions of Computational pathology however the one cited in the article “Computational Pathology: An Emerging Definition”1 Louis DN et al is a holistic way of looking at this space. The author defines computational pathology as an approach to diagnosis that incorporates multiple sources of data (e.g., pathology, radiology, clinical, molecular and lab operations); uses mathematical models to generate diagnostic inferences; and presents clinically actionable knowledge to customers. This vision goes beyond an informatics-centric view and leverages the core competency of pathology and the ability to effectively communicate clinically actionable knowledge.
–– Ian Ellis, Professor of Cancer Pathology, University of Nottingham
–– Jeroen van der Laak , Associate Professor at Radboud University Medical Center - Radboudumc
We are moving rapidly into an era where next-generation pathology is becoming a reality with the advent of digital pathology. Paradigm shifts are being witnessed in cancer care with precision medicine and personalized treatments increasing by the day. Pathologists are absolutely central to this dream of personalized medicine. It is at the desk of the pathologist first clinical decisions regarding the patient is made and that will continue to be the case.²
Increasing workload
Shortage of pathologist
Computational pathology was created to help improve the pathology ecosystem and go beyond to help a range of laboratory activities and goals, including:
One of the main topics of conversation today in the treatment of cancer is the impact of precision medicine. The speed in which precision medicine will become affordable and as accurate as possible will only will become reality when institutions and departments begin to support the development of computational pathology.
Improving diagnostic accuracy
Optimizing patient care
Reducing costs by improving laboratory efficiencies
The evolution of deep learning and the improvement in accuracy for image pattern recognition has been staggering in the last few years. The performance of ImageNet has been slowly improving and for the first time is meaningfully able to challenge humans with less than 5% error rates.4
A practical example is we are seeing trials of driver less cars potentially powered by deep learning technologies. There have been many reasons to think that digitizing images and using machine learning could help pathologists be faster, more accurate and make more accurate diagnoses for patients. This has been a big mission in the field of pathology for more than 30 years. But it’s been only recently that improved scanning, storage, processing and algorithms have made it possible to pursue this mission effectively.5
1 – Louis DN et al, Computational pathology: an emerging definition, Arch Pathol Lab Med, Volume 138, Issue 9, 2014 2 - Sara Bainbridge et al.. (2016). TESTING TIMES TO COME?. Available: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/sites/default/files/testing_times_to_come_nov_16_cruk.pdf 3 - Cancer Facts & Figures - Association of American Medical Colleges. (2014). Physician Specialty Data Book. Available: https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Physician%20Specialty%20Databook%202014.pdf 4 – Kaiming He et al. (2015). Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification 5 - Louis DN et al, Computational Pathology. A Path Ahead, Arch Pathol Lab Med, Vol 140, 2016
You are about to visit a Philips global content page
Continue